Paper

Student Artwork Guide

owls, 1956

Name Class Date

Francis Bacon, owls, 1956. Reproduced for reference; rights reserved by the rights holder.

The facts

Artist
Francis Bacon wikioo.org/en/artists/francis-bacon/
Artist’s dates
1909 – 1992
Medium
Oil On Canvas
Movement
Surrealism Dream logic painted with waking precision: impossible things shown as if they were ordinary.
Artistic style
Figurative Expressionism
Notable elements or techniques
Owls on branches; human figures
Subject or theme
Wildlife and Human Presence

In context

owls, 1956 — Francis Bacon

When might this have been painted?

  1. 1900
  2. 1910
  3. 1920
  4. 1930
  5. 1940
  6. 1950
  7. 1960
  8. 1970
  9. 1980
  10. 1990

Shaded: the lifetime of Francis Bacon (1909–1992)

This record has no exact year on file — using the artist's lifetime and the work's style, what decade would you guess?

Compare with

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: wikioo.org/en/art/similar/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Steel Blue #3b519c

    Catalogued palette

    • #3B519C
    • #8C5F50
    • #362022
    • #506DB9
    Palette
    Dark The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Steel Blue
    Intensity
    Balanced How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Gentle How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Balanced Harmony How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Deep_shadow How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Balanced Soft How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    About this artwork

    owls, 1956 — Francis Bacon

    A Nocturnal Encounter in Blue Hues

    The gaze of this painting, "owls, 1956," immediately draws the viewer into a dreamlike, melancholic space. Set against a deep, enveloping blue background, the composition feels suspended outside of ordinary time. At its heart sit two owls, their forms rendered with a quiet intensity, perched upon gnarled tree limbs. They face one another in an almost conspiratorial manner, suggesting a moment caught between vigilance and intimacy. This pairing of nocturnal sentinels against such a rich blue field evokes the mystery inherent in twilight—a time when secrets are whispered and instincts take over.

    The Enigmatic Human Element

    What elevates this piece beyond a simple wildlife study is the subtle, yet profound, inclusion of human figures. Near the upper left corner and again toward the upper right, two indistinct people observe the scene or perhaps inhabit it alongside the birds. These figures are not central; rather, they function as witnesses to the owl's silent drama. Their presence introduces a layer of narrative tension, suggesting that this natural moment is being observed, analyzed, or perhaps even interrupted by human consciousness. It forces us, the viewers, to question our own role in observing such quiet communion.

    Echoes of Modern Emotionality

    While the subject matter—owls and branches—might suggest a pastoral scene, the overall emotional resonance aligns with the powerful currents of mid-century modern art, particularly those grappling with raw psychological states. The style hints at an engagement with visceral emotion, reminiscent of artists who stripped away polished realism to reveal something more fundamental about the human condition. The technique, even in reproduction, suggests bold brushwork and a commitment to mood over mere depiction. It is a painting that doesn't just hang on a wall; it breathes an atmosphere.

    Symbolism and Interior Resonance

    Owls have long been potent symbols across cultures, representing wisdom, intuition, and the ability to see in darkness. When paired with the deep blue—a color often associated with depth, melancholy, and the subconscious—the piece becomes a meditation on hidden knowledge. For collectors and designers, this artwork offers unparalleled atmospheric depth. Imagine it placed in a study or a sophisticated lounge; its brooding beauty will anchor a space, lending an air of thoughtful mystery. It is art that invites contemplation after the day's noise has faded.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    Francis Bacon

    Born in Dublin, Ireland

    A Life Immersed in the Visceral

    Francis Bacon, a name synonymous with the rawest emotionality in 20th-century art, was born in Dublin, Ireland, in 1909, yet his artistic spirit found its truest expression within the turbulent landscape of post-war Britain. His early life was far from stable; frequent relocations due to his mother’s health instilled a sense of displacement that would profoundly shape his worldview and, ultimately, permeate his canvases. A complex relationship with his stern father and a close bond with his nanny, Jessie Lightfoot, further colored the emotional terrain of his formative years. Initially drawn to horse racing and a life of gambling, Bacon drifted through various occupations before finally dedicating himself to painting in his late twenties – a delayed start that perhaps intensified the urgency and intensity of his later work. He wasn’t formally trained, instead forging his own path, absorbing influences from diverse sources, and developing a uniquely unsettling visual language.

    The Crucible of Early Influences

    Bacon's artistic awakening was not immediate but rather a gradual accumulation of impressions. The works of Pablo Picasso, particularly the distorted figures of his early Cubist period, proved pivotal in liberating him from traditional representation. He found further inspiration in the haunting photography of Egon Schiele, whose expressive distortions of the human form resonated with Bacon’s own burgeoning fascination with the fragility and vulnerability of existence. However, it was a chance encounter with Sergei Eisenstein's film Battleship Potemkin that provided a crucial catalyst. The film’s visceral imagery, particularly a close-up of a screaming face, became an enduring motif in Bacon’s work, representing primal terror and the depths of human suffering. He also deeply admired the Old Masters, notably Diego Velázquez, whose Portrait of Pope Innocent X he would famously reinterpret throughout his career, transforming the authoritative papal figure into a tormented specter. These influences weren't merely stylistic appropriations; they were absorbed and transmuted through Bacon’s own unique sensibility, resulting in an artistic vision that was both deeply personal and universally resonant.

    Forging a Signature Style: Distortion and Isolation

    Bacon’s breakthrough arrived with *Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion* (1944), a work that shocked and captivated audiences in post-war London. This triptych established his signature style – distorted, fragmented figures isolated within claustrophobic spaces. These weren't depictions of religious martyrdom but rather visceral explorations of human anguish, stripped bare of any comforting narrative or spiritual solace. His paintings often feature blurred or dissolving forms, conveying a sense of psychological turmoil and physical vulnerability. He frequently employed geometric structures—cages, boxes—to confine his subjects, emphasizing their isolation and powerlessness. Bacon’s palette was typically muted and somber, reflecting the dark themes he explored, though punctuated by bursts of intense color that heightened the emotional impact. The use of these cages wasn't merely a compositional device; it symbolized the inherent limitations and constraints imposed upon human existence. He sought to capture not just what things looked like but how they felt, translating inner states of anxiety, fear, and despair onto the canvas with brutal honesty.

    Themes of Mortality, Anguish, and the Human Condition

    Throughout his prolific career, Bacon repeatedly returned to certain motifs: the crucifixion as a symbol of suffering; portraits that delved into the psychological intensity of his subjects, often friends and lovers like George Dyer; and self-portraits that served as introspective explorations of identity and mortality. His Study After Velázquez’s Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1953) series is perhaps one of his most iconic achievements, transforming Velázquez's dignified portrait into a screaming apparition, embodying existential dread. The portraits of George Dyer, his volatile lover, are particularly poignant, capturing both the intensity of their connection and the looming shadow of tragedy. Bacon’s work wasn’t about depicting specific individuals; it was about exploring universal themes of human vulnerability, isolation, and the inevitability of death. He didn't shy away from the darker aspects of existence but rather confronted them head-on, forcing viewers to confront their own mortality and anxieties.

    A Lasting Legacy: Challenging Conventions

    Francis Bacon’s impact on 20th-century art is undeniable. He challenged traditional notions of representation, rejecting idealized beauty in favor of a raw, unflinching portrayal of the human condition. His work profoundly influenced generations of artists, paving the way for new forms of expression and challenging conventional artistic boundaries.

    Post-War Expressionism: Bacon is considered a key figure in this movement, influencing artists with his bold style and psychological depth.

    Auction Records & Museum Exhibitions: His paintings continue to command high prices at auction and are exhibited in major museums worldwide, solidifying his place in art history.

    Confronting Truths: Bacon’s legacy lies in his ability to confront uncomfortable truths about human existence and translate those experiences into powerful and unforgettable images.

    Despite a turbulent personal life marked by gambling, drinking, and complex relationships, he remained dedicated to his art until his death in 1992. He left behind a body of work that continues to resonate with audiences today, reminding us of the fragility of existence and the enduring power of art to confront the darkest corners of the human soul. His paintings are not merely images; they are visceral experiences—a testament to the enduring power of art to provoke, disturb, and ultimately, illuminate the complexities of being human.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for owls, 1956

    wikioo.org/en/art/download/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    Bacon, Francis. owls, 1956. n.d., https://wikioo.org/en/art/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/
    APA
    Bacon, Francis (n.d.). owls, 1956 [Painting]. https://wikioo.org/en/art/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/
    Chicago
    Francis Bacon. owls, 1956. n.d. https://wikioo.org/en/art/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/
    Harvard
    Bacon, Francis (n.d.) owls, 1956. Available at: https://wikioo.org/en/art/francis-bacon-owls-1956-6E3SW6-en/

    Look closely

    owls, 1956 — Francis Bacon

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. Our catalogue files this work under: owls, birds, blue background. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    4. Look back at Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion (1944), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.
    5. Surrealism: Dream logic painted with waking precision: impossible things shown as if they were ordinary. Where can you see that in this work?

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.