Paper

Student Artwork Guide

Sir John Vanbrugh

Name Class Date

thomas murray, Sir John Vanbrugh (1718). Public domain.

The facts

Artist
thomas murray wikioo.org/en/artists/thomas-murray/
Artist’s dates
1663 – 1734
Painted
1718
Original size
90 x 70 cm
Movement
Baroque Dramatic, theatrical pictures using deep shadow and strong diagonals to pull you into the action.

In context

Sir John Vanbrugh — thomas murray

How big is it?

The original measures 90 × 70 cm (height × width), drawn here beside an adult of average height.

When was this painted?

  1. 1660
  2. 1670
  3. 1680
  4. 1690
  5. 1700
  6. 1710
  7. 1720
  8. 1730

Shaded: the lifetime of thomas murray (1663–1734) ▲ this work, 1718

Compare with

Pick one work above: name two things it shares with this one, and one thing that's different.

More works to set beside this one: wikioo.org/en/art/similar/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/

Colours

Measured from the image

    Main colour

    Walnut #8d631d

    Catalogued palette

    • #8D631D
    • #CDAB7B
    • #4D2C06
    • #210F02
    Palette
    Earthy The dominant colour family in the image.
    Main colour name
    Walnut
    Intensity
    Balanced How saturated and varied the colours are, from a single toned-down hue to many bright ones.
    Contrast
    Bold How much the colours differ in lightness and saturation across the picture.
    Harmony
    Strong Color Unity How well the colours work together, from clashing to fully unified.
    Brightness
    Deep_shadow How light or dark the picture reads overall, from deep shadow to bright highlight.
    Saturation
    Balanced Soft How pure and strong the colours are, from near-grey to fully vivid.

    Artist and museum

    Artist

    thomas murray

    Early Life and Apprenticeship

    Thomas Murray, born in Scotland in 1663, emerged during a period of significant artistic transition. While details surrounding his early upbringing remain somewhat elusive, it is known that he initially received instruction from a member of the esteemed De Critz family—a lineage renowned for their limner work and heraldic painting. This foundational training likely instilled in Murray a meticulous attention to detail and an appreciation for refined technique. However, recognizing the burgeoning demand for portraiture, his artistic path soon led him to London and the studio of John Riley, arguably the most successful portraitist of the late 17th century England. Riley’s workshop was a hub of activity, catering to the aristocracy and gentry, and Murray quickly absorbed the prevailing style—a focus on capturing likeness with an emphasis on facial features, often leaving the broader composition and background details to assistants. This division of labor was common at the time, but it shaped Murray's early career trajectory.

    A Flourishing Portrait Practice

    Following Riley’s death in 1691, Murray inherited not only his studio space but also a substantial clientele. He rapidly established himself as a prominent portrait painter, becoming highly sought after by noble patrons and individuals of standing. The early years of the 18th century saw him consistently engaged in commissions, painting members of Parliament, military figures, and other influential personalities. His style, while initially derivative of Riley’s, gradually developed its own distinct character—a refined elegance coupled with a remarkable ability to convey personality through subtle nuances of expression. Murray's success wasn’t solely attributable to his artistic skill; he cultivated a reputation for being courteous, diligent, and attentive to the needs of his sitters, fostering strong relationships that secured repeat business and valuable referrals.

    Royal Commissions and Artistic Recognition

    A pivotal moment in Murray’s career arrived in 1703 when he received the prestigious commission to paint Queen Anne for the Society of the Middle Temple. This portrait, a testament to his growing reputation, solidified his position among the leading artists of the day. The work exemplifies his mastery of capturing regal bearing and dignified composure. Beyond this significant royal commission, Murray continued to receive commissions from prominent figures, including William Dampier, the renowned explorer, whose portrait showcases his ability to depict character and experience. He was a prolific artist, producing numerous portraits that now grace both public institutions and private collections.

    The Uffizi Self-Portrait and Later Life

    In 1708, Murray embarked on a journey to Italy, a common practice for aspiring artists seeking inspiration from the Old Masters. During his visit to Florence, he contributed a self-portrait to the esteemed Uffizi Gallery—a gesture that underscored his ambition and desire for recognition within the broader European art world. This portrait, like many of his others, was subsequently engraved, further disseminating his image and style. Despite achieving considerable financial success – it is reported he left £40,000 upon his death in 1734—Murray’s later life was marked by a degree of irony. He had reportedly complained of poverty throughout his career, yet amassed a substantial fortune through shrewd investments alongside his painting practice. His will stipulated the erection of a monument with a bust in Westminster Abbey, but only if it did not prove too costly. Ultimately, his nephew deemed the cost prohibitive and instead buried him in St. Paul’s, Covent Garden, leaving the grand memorial unrealized.

    Legacy and Historical Significance

    Thomas Murray occupies a fascinating position within the history of British portraiture. He was not an innovator in the same vein as Van Dyck or Reynolds, but he was a highly skilled craftsman who successfully catered to the tastes of his era. His portraits offer valuable insights into the social and political landscape of early 18th-century England, capturing the likenesses of individuals who shaped the nation’s destiny. While often described as a “face painter,” relying on assistants for broader compositional elements, Murray's ability to imbue his sitters with personality and dignity remains undeniable. His work serves as a compelling reminder of the importance of portraiture in documenting history and preserving the memory of those who came before. His contribution lies not in revolutionizing artistic technique but in consistently delivering high-quality portraits that met the demands of a discerning clientele, securing his place as one of Scotland’s most successful portrait painters.

    Where to read more

    Find this online

    QR code linking to the download page for Sir John Vanbrugh

    wikioo.org/en/art/download/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/

    Cite this artwork

    MLA
    murray, thomas. Sir John Vanbrugh. 1718, https://wikioo.org/en/art/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/
    APA
    murray, thomas (1718). Sir John Vanbrugh [Painting]. https://wikioo.org/en/art/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/
    Chicago
    thomas murray. Sir John Vanbrugh. 1718. https://wikioo.org/en/art/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/
    Harvard
    murray, thomas (1718) Sir John Vanbrugh. Available at: https://wikioo.org/en/art/thomas-murray-sir-john-vanbrugh-AQU47A-en/

    Look closely

    Sir John Vanbrugh — thomas murray

    Look closely

    Answer in your own words. There are no wrong answers here — only answers you can explain.

    1. What catches your eye first, and why?
    2. Which colours or shapes create the mood — and what is that mood?
    3. How many faces can you find? ____ (our catalogue counts 1 — do you agree?)
    4. Our catalogue files this work under: baroque portraiture, 18th century nobility, velvet and gold detail. Do you agree? What would you add, or take away?
    5. Look back at Sir Hugh Clopton (1671–1751) (1724), earlier in this guide. Name two things it shares with this work, and one that is different.

    Your response

    Write a short paragraph about this artwork. Use the facts from the earlier parts of this guide, and your answers above.